When looking at five disassembled pieces in an Assembling Objects question, what is a good FIRST step?

ASSEMBLING OBJECTS strategies in order of effectiveness: (1) COUNT PIECES — make sure each answer accounts for the same number of pieces as shown; assembled shapes that hide or duplicate pieces are wrong; (2) ESTIMATE AREA — total piece area = assembled shape area (eyeballing this is enough); answers with substantially larger or smaller assembled shapes are wrong; (3) IDENTIFY DISTINCTIVE PIECES — one piece often has a unique shape (a sharp angle, a curve, a specific size); find that piece in each answer; if it's not findable in an answer, that answer is wrong; (4) LOOK FOR DISTINCTIVE COMBINATIONS — two pieces that obviously fit together one way; find that combination in the answer; (5) ELIMINATE WRONG ANSWERS FIRST — usually 2-3 of 4 answers have obvious errors (wrong outline shape, missing piece, overlapping pieces, wrong angles); once eliminated, the remaining 1-2 are easier to compare; (6) CHECK THE OUTLINE — the OUTLINE of the assembled figure must be one that the pieces can form when fitted edge-to-edge; check the overall outer shape first; (7) IF STUCK, MAKE BEST GUESS AND MOVE ON — AO is timed; spending 2 minutes on one question costs you 4-5 other questions you could answer correctly. The ASVAB does NOT penalize wrong answers, so always answer every question even if guessing. TIMED PRACTICE: when practicing, work with a timer; aim for ~30-40 seconds per question initially, working toward 25 seconds with practice; if you can solve all the easier ones in ~20 seconds you'll have time for the harder ones. COMMON MISTAKES: (a) Trying to mentally assemble the pieces in order — instead, look at the assembled answer and check whether the pieces fit; (b) Getting fixated on one piece and one answer for too long; (c) Ignoring obvious red flags (like answer choices with completely different outline shapes); (d) Not eliminating obvious wrong answers first. The questions are designed to be doable in 30 seconds with the right approach — they're testing pattern matching and spatial reasoning, not careful proofs.