-
A
The city had superior weapons
-
B
Its geography and defenses combined to make it extremely difficult to conquer — water on three sides eliminated attack from those directions, and the wall concentrated defense on one front
-
C
The attackers were always incompetent
-
D
The city was never actually attacked
Why this is the answer
Inference requires drawing a reasonable conclusion from stated evidence. The passage gives two facts: water on three sides AND a massive wall on the fourth. The logical inference: both features contributed to survival — natural water barriers eliminated three attack vectors, leaving only one fortified approach. This is the classic ASVAB inference format: evidence stated → conclusion not stated but clearly implied.
Source: ASVAB PC, Inference