Insurance · Casualty Insurance Basics

What is 'negligence per se'?

Correct answer

When violation of a statute (law) constitutes automatic negligence — the injured party does not need to separately prove the defendant failed to act as a reasonable person

  1. A Extreme negligence bordering on intentional
  2. B Negligence in commercial settings only
  3. C When violation of a statute (law) constitutes automatic negligence — the injured party does not need to separately prove the defendant failed to act as a reasonable person
  4. D A Latin term for comparative fault

Why this is the answer

Negligence per se applies when a defendant violated a statute designed to protect the public from the type of harm that occurred. In these cases, the violation itself establishes the negligence element — the plaintiff doesn't need to separately argue what a 'reasonable person' would have done. Example: a driver who ran a red light (violating a traffic statute) and hit a pedestrian is negligent per se — the statute violation establishes negligence. The plaintiff still needs to prove causation and damages.
Source: P&C Exam, Negligence Per Se

Practice more questions

This question is from our Insurance License Practice Tests practice test. Take the full practice test to test your knowledge across all Casualty Insurance Basics and other topics.

Take the Casualty Insurance practice test →

About this topic: Casualty Insurance Basics

Casualty insurance basics cover the concept of legal liability, negligence and its elements, the types of damages, and how liability policies respond — including the duty to defend. This is one of 11 Casualty Insurance questions on casualty insurance basics, each with a full explanation on a single study page.

New to this exam? Our Insurance exam guide explains the format, scoring, and how to prepare.

Related questions

State-specific guides

Need information for your state? Our state guides cover local requirements, fees, and what to expect on exam day.