Insurance · Laws and Regulations

What is the difference between a 'no-fault' auto insurance system and a traditional 'tort' (at-fault) system?

Correct answer

In a no-fault system, each driver's own insurer pays for their injuries regardless of who caused the accident (with limits on suing), while in a tort system the at-fault driver's insurer is responsible for the other party's injuries

  1. A They are the same
  2. B In a no-fault system, each driver's own insurer pays for their injuries regardless of who caused the accident (with limits on suing), while in a tort system the at-fault driver's insurer is responsible for the other party's injuries
  3. C No-fault means no insurance is required
  4. D Tort systems pay no claims

Why this is the answer

Under a traditional tort (at-fault) system, the driver who caused the accident — and their liability insurer — is responsible for the other party's injuries and damages, and injured parties can sue the at-fault driver. Under a no-fault system (used in some states), each driver's own insurer pays for their own injuries (through personal injury protection) regardless of who was at fault, and the ability to sue the other driver is restricted except in serious cases. No-fault aims to speed payment and reduce litigation. The specifics, including thresholds for suing, vary by state. Understanding the no-fault-versus-tort distinction is standard auto-regulations content.
Source: NAIC Model Outline, No-Fault vs Tort

Practice more questions

This question is from our Insurance License Practice Tests practice test. Take the full practice test to test your knowledge across all Laws and Regulations and other topics.

Take the Casualty Insurance practice test →

New to this exam? Our Insurance exam guide explains the format, scoring, and how to prepare.

Related questions

State-specific guides

Need information for your state? Our state guides cover local requirements, fees, and what to expect on exam day.